Search

6.1 Synopsis

Communities in the buffer zone face restrictions on the livelihood activities in terms of land available for agriculture, use of forest resources and constraints on the development of settlements.

Geographic location place many of the buffer zone communities at a disadvantage in economic terms as well as accessing basic services, often resulting in a high dependency on forest resources, higher levels of poverty and food insecurity.

The diverse ethnic make-up of the buffer zone communes creates different challenges and opportunities in relation to forest management due to their different tenure, cultural approaches to farming and common pool resources management, gender equality and access to services such as health and education.

Policies and plans to promote collaborative management and establish PES systems face challenges in their effectiveness of meeting the twin goals of ecosystem resilience and livelihood security, possibly with high transaction costs and benefits of managing forests.

Access to financial and material resources for livelihood development are restricted within the buffer zone communities, and there are significant barriers to local communities entering unfamiliar markets (e.g. tourism) or developing non-agricultural income-generating activities and adding value to existing agricultural produce.

The AHP is in genetic isolation and fragmentation, higher risk of species extinction and increased vulnerability to stochastic and catastrophic events. In summary, they are highly vulnerable and will likely experience high rates of habitat fragmentation, degradation and species extinction in the near future processes which will be exacerbated by climate change.

The SGP packages (community development, community outreach and conservation awareness) are designed to support capacity building within the local communities and direct financial and technical assistance to farmers, resource users and through a mix of market-orientated and resource management approaches and building resilience against the immediate to mid-term shocks which will arise from climate change and increasing global commodity prices by:

Gender equality is an important and cross-cutting objective of the ACB SGP and SG interventions will be specifically geared towards supporting women and women’s groups in all aspects of the small grant packages.

6.2 Economic Profile

In the buffer zone communes of the KKKNP, people’s livelihoods are mainly based on agriculture, formal economic activities have not been developed. There are 11 private enterprises and 3 cooperatives registered to operate (Table 7). In which, 02 enterprises mainly operate in the forestry; 03 enterprises operating mainly in the construction activities; 03 enterprises mainly operate in the field of trading construction materials and petroleum and 01 company operates in livestock breeding. However, only two forestry companies are large and labor intensive in planting, tending and protecting forests. The rest are just small companies, employing less than 10 employees.

Table 6. Number of enterprises in buffer zone communes

District Commune Private Enterprise State Enterprises Cooperative
Kbang Krong 3 0 1
Dak Roong 2 0 0
Kon Pne 0 0 1
Mang Yang Ayun 3 1 1
Đak Jo Ta 1 0 0
Hra      
Dak Doa Ha Dong 0 0 0
Total   9 1 3

Cooperatives play the role of supporting and directing agricultural production for farmers in the communes. Cooperatives will often be the focal point to supply high quality seedlings and fertilizers to farmers. In addition, the cooperation will play the role of finding output for local agricultural products by linking with processing companies and purchasing companies. However, the activities of most of the Cooperatives, such as in Kon Pne, Kroong, here are still very weak at present, there is no clear orientation to develop agricultural products. Farmers still produce products by themselves in the traditional way, with a small area, few products, and unstable quality. So, they have a low selling price.

By 2022, in the buffer zone of KKKNP, there are 2 communes, Ayun and Ha Dong, achieving a 3-star rating of OCOP product (One Commune-One product) for 5 products. In which, Ayun commune has 4 products including: Dried bamboo shoots, Litsea cubeba essential oil, Litsea cubeba oil room spray, Lemongrass salt. These are all products produced by Quyet Tien Agriculture and Forestry Cooperative. Ha Dong commune has a product that is Anh Tuan dried bamboo shoots (Dried bamboo shoots) produced and registered by Dao Anh Tuan business household

In addition, Ayun commune has had a link with Ba Cham Company Limited to produce and consume Ba Cham rice, a specialty rice of the Bahnar people in Mang Yang. The production area is 24.25ha with 75 participating households, the yield is 4.7 tons/ha. The production of indigenous products with economic value can be a good direction for the economic development of local people in the coming time. 

6.2.1 Formal Economic Activities

In the buffer zone of KKKNP, poor households and ethnic minorities account for high proportion. The interview results at the buffer zone communes in 2021 show that 90% of the interviewees are farmers and their livelihood depend on agricultural activities (Table 8, Figure 11). The main crops include annual crops (e.g., rice, maize, cassava, vegetables and beans) and perennial crops (e.g., coffee, Litsea sp., fruit trees). The livelihood of human beings in the buffer zone still highly depends on harvesting NTFPs in natural forests. In addition, the protection of forest areas allocated to the community is also a stable income-enhancing job for local people.

Table 7. Key information of local community in buffer zone of KKKNP

ID Variable Information
1 Ethnic minority 114 (Bahnar: 110; Nung: 4)
2 Average number of family member 5
3 Average number of labours in family 3
4 Monthly income 2.5 million VND (~ 120 USD)
5 Main income source Agricultural production: 90% Other works: Free workers, rubber tapping, small trader, grocery seller
6 Household status 60.2% of poor and near poor households:
7 Living house status 47.6% of makeshift houses
8 Food scarce 66% of households sometime lack food in the year.
9 Time of food scarce Scarcest from August to December
10 Measures to overcome food scarce Borrowing from relatives and neighbours: 95.5 % Selling crops:   52.9 % Selling livestock: 41.1% Exploiting NTFPs: 39.7%
11 Rice area 75% of households have rice field Average area per household: 2800 m2
12 Rice productivity 5.2 ton/ha/year.
13 Coffee area 26.2% of households have coffee land Average area per household: 6370 m2
14 Income from Coffee 16.3 million VND/ha/year
15 Cassava area 70% of household have cassava area; Average area per household: 9275 m2; Productivity: 6 ton/ha
16 Income from cassava 10.7 million VND/ha/year
17 NTFPs harvesting 61% of households have harvested NTFPs in KKK NP. In there, 81% is harvested for family use while the rest is harvested for sale and use.
18 Income from sale NTFPs 12.4 million VND/year
19 Distance to area of NTFPs ~ 6 km
20 Join the forest protection group 44% (51/115)
21 Community forest protect 1.5 – 8 million VND/Year

(Data from interviews in 2021; 103 households)

Figure 11. Agricultural production in buffer zone of KKKNP

6.2.2 Informal Economic Activities

The economy of the communes in the buffer zone is still very small, the main economic activity is agricultural production with the goal of self-sufficiency. Informal economic activities in this area include activities related to illegal forest product exploitation such as illegal logging, hunting of wild animals. However, information on these activities is difficult to collect, so further investigations are needed to make a more accurate assessment.

6.2.3 Key Livelihood Issues and Challenges

6.2.4 Non-governmental and Civil Society Initiatives and Support

Over the years, the communes in the buffer zone of KKKNP have received a lot of support from NGOs and civil society organizations (CSOs) such as Dak Doa district charity association, Ho Chi Minh city charity association, etc. These aids are usually organized through coordination with the Red Cross or the Commune People’s Committee support directly to local people.

There are 10 emergency funding packages from sponsors FRF (France), AIPF (USA), Intel Vietnam, British Council; SC International, AAV (UK), ECHO, FAO, USAID, UN Women, WHO, UNICEF, etc. through the Red Cross have contributed to supporting people to stabilize their lives. In addition to supporting food, clean water, health care, and seedlings, these organizations have also trained people to develop their livelihoods, and food security, and raise awareness and capacity for the community on risk reduction about disasters.

At present, the local people are receiving supports from other projects such as:

6.3 Women and Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities

The democracy and justice of the Bahnar are evidently expressed in social practice. There have been records that the disadvantaged groups are paid attention in the fields of economy, social relations, cultural activities and beliefs. The centralization, publicity and transparency in handling conflicts of interests have created social justice for disadvantaged groups in general and women in particular in Bahnar society (Nhung, 2019).

Bahnar women are observed to actively participate in social work and contribute much to activities of mass organizations. In Bahnar communities, there are a number of Bahnar women who are nominated as village heads. The women also work with mass organizations to mobilize villagers to change their habits of raising cattle in their households to preserve environmental sanitation and health, mobilize people to use settling tanks for clean water, to bring their children to schools and sensitize women in reproductive health and family planning.

Learning and access to education of Bahnar girls and other ethnic minorities in the region are considered low. Poverty is the biggest barrier. In addition, ethnic minority girls face other barriers such as having to work, inadequate family awareness of the benefits of education, lack of school and teaching facilities.

The local workforce includes 19,777 employees including 10,090 male and 9,687 female, equivalent to 48.9%. Most of the workers are engaged in farming, only a few are engaged in both farming and other side jobs with low average income and jobs are unstable.

The Bahnar have customary laws that clearly define the responsibilities and behaviours of each individual in marriage and family relationships as well as regulations on physical abuse. Accordingly, the crimes of raping and beating women are classified as felonies and are properly punished by a village’s adjudication community run by the prestigious Village Elder and village chiefs and members of mass organizations. The issue needs to be concerned here is how to increase women’s awareness and knowledge about the provisions of customary law in particular and the law of the state in general to protect them against domestic violence.

Health care of people in the locality has achieved some results. The grassroots health care network has been strengthened. Each commune has a local health station. Some communes have been upgraded with dispensaries and increased the number of medical staff and doctors. National preventive health programs have been implemented in a timely and effective manner, such as programs for the prevention and control of goiter, leprosy, malaria, expanded immunization program, etc.

6.3.1 Women and IPLC Challenges

6.3.2 Opportunities

In order to protect women’s legitimate rights and interests as well as promote gender equality, Women’s Unions have been allowed by the state to operate at four administrative levels of central, provincial, district and commune ones. The Women’s Union has the role of mobilizing and supporting women to improve their capacity and qualification, improve their material and spiritual lives and build a happy family; The Women’s Union also performs the work of propagating and educating women about the State’s laws, thereby creating conditions for women to be aware of the basic rights stipulated in Vietnamese law.

The Vietnam Women’s Union (VWU) is a mass organization, also a member of of the Vietnam Fatherland Front, the ASEAN Confederation of Women’s Organizations (ACWO), and the Women’s International Democratic Federation (WIDF). The VWU represents the legitimate rights and interests of Vietnamese women; strive for women’s development and gender equality.

In addition, the government also issued a number of policies/programs to support ethnic minority women such as: the program on supporting gender equality activities in ethnic minority areas in the period of 2018-2025; policy of supporting poor ethnic minority women when giving birth according to population policy (Decree No. 39/2015/ND-CP); support for rapid and sustainable poverty reduction (Resolution No. 30 / A / 2008 / NQ-CP); Program “Communication on gender equality in ethnic minority and mountainous areas until 2030, phase I from 2021-2025”.

At the locality, Gia Lai Provincial People’s Committee in recent years has promoted activities for gender equality and the advancement of women. In 2019, 6 main contents were implemented, including: promoting propaganda, dissemination and education activities on gender equality policies and laws; improving the capacity and effectiveness of state management on gender equality; continuing to implement the national action plan on gender equality and the project “Prevention of domestic violence on the basis of gender equality”; strengthening inter-sectoral coordination in order to well implement activities for the advancement of women; organizing activities in response to Action Month for Gender Equality and Gender-Based Violence Prevention and Control; strengthening the activities of the Committee for the Advancement of Women.

Nearly 18,000 hectares have been contracted to 26 Bahnar village communities for protection. Every year, each village receives 250 million VND of contracted funding for forest protection. This funding is divided equally among households while one part of this funding is used to buy plows and water pumps for general production and capital support for poor households. From 2015 to 2020, KKK NP paid households contracted to protect forests and provide forest environmental services with an amount of 27.536 billion VND, contributing to increasing incomes and improving livelihoods for nearly 772 Bahnar ethnic minority households living in the buffer zone of Kon Ka Kinh National Park.

Gia Lai province determines the goal of developing eco-tourism into a spearhead economic sector of the locality; in which attention is paid to the conservation and development of traditional craft villages, investment in infrastructure to develop tourism services in the locality in general and especially in the Kon Ka Kinh NP area in particular. This is a favorable condition to promote livelihood development and increase income for indigenous people in general and Bahnar women with brocade weaving and rattan basket weaving in particular.

In the period of 2017-2020, the buffer zone of Kon Ka Kinh National Park has been supported with a budget of 3.28 billion VND to invest in infrastructure and some production equipment and machinery. In the period of 2021-2030, the buffer zone has been planned to be granted a budget of VND 27.883 billion to develop the economy, build models for agricultural and forestry extension, support scattered tree planting, and build green boundaries for the planning area of agricultural production land (swidden cultivation), raise public awareness on forest protection and development, support training and restore traditional jobs and indigenous culture.

6.4 Conservation Challenges

KKKNP is an area diverse in species, especially species with high economic value, so this is a great challenge for the NP staff to protect nature. In addition, the economic development of the communities living around the NP also creates considerable pressure on the maintenance of the intact ecosystem.

6.4.1 Species of Conservation Significance

The endangered species with conservation significance have been focused by KKKNP are described in the Table 9 below.

Table 8. Biodiversity conservation focuses in KKKNP in 2020 – 2030.

ID Biodiversity conservation focus
1 Investigation and conservation of medicinal plant resources and cultivable potential in KKKNP
2 Investigation, planning for conservation and sustainable use of NTFPs in KKKNP
3 Conservation of Muntiacus truongsonensis species in KKKNP
4 Conservation and development of Pterocarpus macrocarpus species in KKKNP
5 Investigate and monitor mammal and primates
6 Investigate and monitor Carnivora
7 Investigate the distribution of conifer species in KKKNP
8 Create of new positioning plots to study forest succession
9 Investigation and monitoring of pests, diseases and invasive species to conserve biodiversity in KKKNP.
10 Investigation, replanting and conservation of endangered and rare species.
11 Investigate the current status and propose solutions to conserve and protect Otters (Lutrinae) species in KKKNP
12 Investigate the current status and propose solutions to conserve and protect turtle species in KKKNP
13 Investigate the current status and propose solutions to conserve and protect Pangolins species in KKKNP
14 Investigate and create a fish species list in KKKNP
15 Investigate the current status and propose solutions to conserve and protect Marbled cat species in KKKNP

6.4.2 Effects of Agriculture on Biodiversity

The development of the agricultural economy has significantly improved the livelihood of people in the buffer zone of Kon Ka Kinh National Park. However, the expansion of agricultural areas creates a lot of issues in biodiversity conservation activities.

The first problem is the encroachment of natural forests for farming. Population growth leading to a lack of agricultural land is a problem in the buffer zone communes of KKKNP. About 60% of the interviewees (69/115) said that they are feeling a lack of land to develop farming. According to the report of the People’s Committees of the buffer zone communes, there have been cases of encroachment on forestry land for agricultural cultivation in recent years, such as in Ha Dong commune, there are 5 cases of shifting cultivation in 2020; In 2019, Ayun commune had some cases of deforestation for farming in sub-zone 439 Hier village, in 2018 there were 13 households encroaching on forestry land. Although the farming area of ​​the people has little direct border with the KKKNP, these incidents are also a sign of the great influence of agricultural development on forests, especially conservation.

In addition, the use of pesticides (insecticides, herbicides) also destroys grasslands, pollutes water sources, and destroys soil and water organisms. However, the effects of the use of pesticides have not been specifically evaluated and information is lacking.

In addition, invasive organisms and disease-causing viruses that spread according to human livelihood activities such as animal husbandry and cultivation are also at a very high risk of affecting the biodiversity of KKKNP.

Population growth leads to an increase in agricultural activities in the buffer zone, which will have a significant impact on the forest and biodiversity of KKKNP.

6.4.3 Natural Resource Issues

KKKNP faces many problems in forest resource management and biodiversity protection. Deforestation and exploitation of precious species such as Fokienia hodginsii, Dalbergia cochinchinensis, etc still take place. The inter-commune roads such as the road to Ha Dong commune, and the road to Kon Pne commune running into the middle of the NP have increased forest access for illegal loggers.

People in the buffer zone have been exploiting NTFPs (orchids, rattan, honey, bamboo shoots, medicinal plants, and edible nuts) in non-sustainable way in KKKNP. The exploitation of some species in large numbers threatens the survival of these species in the wild, such as Anoectochilus setaceus, Fibraurea tinctoria, and Coscinium fenestratum, etc. Currently, there is no data on assessing the level of exploitation of NTFPs in KKKNP, and it is difficult for the park to control the illegal harvesting. At present, the benefit-sharing mechanism of PFES for local people is still not well-developed. This also often lead to potential conflicts among communities.

The forest protection force is considered small when compared to the size of area that they are tasked to monitor and patrol. Therefore, it is not effective as anticipated in monitoring the illegal activities. The forest protection force is also not responsible to apprehend violators but only to advise and record the illegal activities incidents. More than 75% (16/21) of the staff of the forest protection force interviewed on the other hand, felt that they were working in a difficult and dangerous environment, lacking protective equipment and low benefits.

6.4.4 Barriers to Sustainable Use

In the buffer zone of Kon Ka Kinh National Park, the main barriers to sustainable use of natural resources are briefly described as follows: